Animal cruelty punishments

I thought about the suggestion of protecting innocents Ty but if they're willing to mug old ladies then that theory goes out of the window. (no pun intended)

In that respect do you think that gang culture is bringing us back to an almost feral state? Logic doesn't apply in the more commonly regocnised sense.

Tytonidae wrote:

LP wrote:Ok Mr Tit and little miss Tat, haven't you both agreed (several years ago now) that the punishments for animal cruelty are too leanient?

Well obviously I think so LP. In TOAB's first post that 'BUT' and 'TO BE HONEST' in his last line, kind of let his declaration down, imo.

Ah well. We're all entitled to our opinion.

If a gang of kids turn feral and end up getting hurt in a gang fight, does that count as animal cruelty?

[quote="markeymark"]

LP wrote:If a gang of kids turn feral and end up getting hurt in a gang fight, does that count as animal cruelty?[/quote



course not they got human rights, but till us human sort ourselfs out the rest of the planet has much of a chance

If you're waiting for that then I think you might be waiting a long time. It was a tongue in cheek question anyway but despite our so called intelligence we are still so closely related to the animal world. Problem is we're halfway between comprehension and instinct, we've moved away from instinct so we can't read animals properly anymore but we haven't reached full comprehension, where by we one again understand animals but in human terms. I don't mean by humaizing them but by be able to describe what we once knew instinctively. Does that make any sense?

My head hurts after that!

You should have tried writing it

Yes please!

Savages

[quote="markeymark"]

LP wrote:

markeymark wrote:

LP wrote:If a gang of kids turn feral and end up getting hurt in a gang fight, does that count as animal cruelty?[/quote



course not they got human rights, but till us human sort ourselfs out the rest of the planet has much of a chance

If you're waiting for that then I think you might be waiting a long time. It was a tongue in cheek question anyway but despite our so called intelligence we are still so closely related to the animal world. Problem is we're halfway between comprehension and instinct, we've moved away from instinct so we can't read animals properly anymore but we haven't reached full comprehension, where by we one again understand animals but in human terms. I don't mean by humaizing them but by be able to describe what we once knew instinctively. Does that make any sense?

see what you saying but we humans have come along way from then.like you said we once knew instinctively, but we know now moraly now, that the Frightening thing we never learn for a long time to come to repect our planet and what we got

But at least we are learning, we’ve come a long way in the short time we’ve been here and I’d like to think we’ll keep getting better. Time will tell and I doubt any of us will ever see it though